Oscillating Style Machines Comparison Chart
PRODUCT |
PRICE RANGE |
RELIABILITY |
CONSTRUCTION |
QUALITY |
PERFORMANCE |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION |
OVERALL RATING |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vibra Pro 5500 |
 |
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Dynafit |
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Vibra Pro Slim |
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Proellixe |
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Farfalla |
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
K1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
T-Zone |
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
K2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Europlate |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Vibra-trim |
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Kwik Fit 4U 1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Vitality 600 |
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
Tri-planar Style Machines Comparison Chart
PRODUCT |
PRICE RANGE |
RELIABILITY |
CONSTRUCTION |
QUALITY |
PERFORMANCE |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION |
OVERALL RATING |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bodywave Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
Powerplate Pro5 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Ultra 6100 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Powerplate my5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Vibra Pro Health |
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Vibrogym |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Turbosonic |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Powerplate my3 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
The criteria used for the comparison chart was based upon information provided by manufacturers as well as customer satisfaction and critiquing by actual users of the machines from blogs to personal experience from those users that I personally spoke to. Reliability was based on numerous factors including longevity, and condition that shipped machine was received by customers. Construction information took into account the materials used for construction of the machine. Plastic components were the lowest rated and stainless steel the highest rated. The quality heading took many factors into consideration, among them user friendliness in design, assembly, overall appearance and feel of the machine and overall design. Performance was judged by the operation of the machine and how well it performed compared to its claims. The supporting manuals, videos (if any), literature, telephone customer support, as well performance lead to the customer satisfaction rating. The final overall rating was based on the average of all the criteria. As I said earlier, I will let you decide which machine is best suited for you. But in case you were still curious to know which machines my friends and family have purchased, I have compiled a short list below and have tried to categorize the people involved so you can find an appropriate match to you.
Chart Of Machines Recommended To Friends
NAME |
PERSONAL BACKGROUND |
MACHINE |
|---|---|---|
Britney |
Wanted to lose weight, shed inches, not very active, limited budget available, wants smaller machine as she lives in an apartment. Uses 3 times a week – glowing recommendation. |
Farfalla |
Marco V. |
Budget not really an issue, chronic back issues, wanted pain relief. Very satisfied as the machine has really helped him with his pain. Is now golfing again. |
Vibra Pro 7000 |
Margaret |
In her 50’s, slim, fit, very active, wanted to tone, main concern was osteoporosis, moderate budget. Uses 2-3 times a week, feels stronger with much more energy. |
Prohealth |
Emma |
Mother of 3, overweight, not very active. Wanted a machine for herself and her children. Uses the machine daily. All her children in their early 20s all use the machine. Very happy as she has lost 3 inches on her waistline. Multiple hand grips are perfect for her son to warm up before baseball games. |
Pro 615A |
